Mail Index

Re: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?

• To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
• From: Andreas Plesner Jacobsen <apj@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:12:38 +0200
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306031248200.2869-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306041152290.12903-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Resent-date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:13:58 +0200
• Resent-from: allan@xxxxxxxxxx
• Resent-message-id: <20030831081358.GE7077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Resent-to: allan@xxxxxxxxxx
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:55:47AM -0700, zak@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I've been unable to get Apache::Request to with Apache2, and thus unable 
> to get Apache::Gallery to work.

Michael is currently working on removing Apache::Request from A::G so it
will run under mod_perl 2.

Whoever put Apache 2 in Redhat ought to be hung, drawn and quartered.

-- 
Andreas Plesner Jacobsen | Consultant, n.:
                         |         An ordinary man a long way from home.

• References:
  • [ApacheGallery] Has anyone attempted to create an rpm?
    • From: zak
  • [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
    • From: zak

• Prev by Date: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
• Next by Date: Re: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
• Previous by thread: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: [ApacheGallery] Is anyone using Apache::Gallery under Apache 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread